Inscription

Élection présidentielle 2017


Retour à la liste des candidats Statistiques des votes de soutien pour José Bové sur les 30 derniers jours :

Il y a un mois   

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
   Aujourd'hui

Je trouve ce site utile pour la démocratie, je fais un don !
Donner avec Paypal

Aider José Bové à se présenter

Pour permettre à José Bové de se présenter à l'élection préssidentielle de 2017, sa candiature doit recueillir les fameuses "500 signatures". Ces signatures sont en réalité des formulaires de présentation d'un candidat que les élus locaux renvoient au Conseil Constitutionnel. Il est très difficile pour les candidats de réunir 500 soutien lors qu'ils sont peu connus, ou se présentent hors des principaux partis. Si vous pensez que le programme de José Bové mérite d'être proposé aux français lors de l'élection présidentielle, prenez rendez-vous avec le maire de votre commune pour lui expliquer pourquoi il doit apporter son soutien à José Bové, envoyez ensuite cette page à vos amis et sur les réseaux sociaux. Cela peut vraiment aider plus de candidats pour se présenter et ainsi contribuer au débat démocratique.

Pour avoir une idée plus précise, voici ce à quoi ressemble le formulaire que doivent remplir les élus pour soutenir José Bové :





Dernières informations sur José Bové (source Twitter, "à prendre avec des pincettes") :


In theory, yes, it does. But putting aside article 13, do you think that the proposals in the remaining articles will achieve the goal of a DSM in other digital content providers, like Amazon, Netflix, etc, etc?

#HelpCatalonia @libe @quatremer @ScotNational @guardian @dw_conflictzone @politiken @KarnaMikko  @josebove @GeorgeKerevan @markdemesmaeker @lalibrebe @washingtonpost @iainmacwhirter @AlJazeera @dieLinke @SkaKeller @SZ @hrw  @amnesty @tfajon @ivajgl @welt @Bayernpartei https://twitter.com/ronniecowan/status/1087682728349323265 …

Maybe it would be good if you join a collective management society, it's free to become a member.

Meme's are exempt from the application of # Art13,as we have said about three thousand times in five hundred conversations like this one with you. You want to say that we have to sacrifice the original works of other authors, so that you do not have to worry about being claimed?

And, how do you collect your money now? user to user? or you give it for free, just for knowing....

That, happens in the online market and in the physical too.Precisely the EU with the #CopyrightDirective is trying to create a single digital market, which can avoid that. It does not seem like a bad idea, right? All licensed and allowing freedom to users, what a good thing !!!!

My "users"? That would be the right spot for the memes you used (without owning the copyright). I am an artist. My "users" are called customers and fans. You're so delusional in your bubble of thinking. Full of hate, not even willing to see other sides, let alone understand. Bye.

Qui pense encore qu'une grande partie des #GiletsJaunes ne partage pas l'agenda écologique de la planète et l'utopie réaliste d'une économie équilibrée ? @PLudosky à lancé le mouvement avec sa pétition, elle l'entretient par ses réflexions @MassiotAude @EstherBenbassa @josebove https://twitter.com/PLudosky/status/1087612062342225922 …

Oh my...*sigh*It's good to get licenses for some things. For others there aren't any easily available licenses. I'm an artist, making my own copyrighted art, but I'm not in a collecting society & no platform could simply get licenses for all my pieces that would work for filters.

@loxatus, sincere question. From a user standpoint, regarding licenses, have you ever being blocked of watch/buy something digitally because the provider did not get the license for Spain, but the same content is available in another EU country?

Thanks for showing me that you are not interested in an honest discussion or that we don't share the same moral values.

And then try to exempt yourself from the payment and passing that responsibility on to your users? They know that you think so?

Why do not you think it's a good idea to acquire a license? Maybe you host protected content for which you are not willing to remunerate the rights holders for its use and public communication? Could that be the hypothetical case?

Yes, of course I want. And you ?pic.twitter.com/XRF5GTzvzQ

Yeahhhhhh..... hhahahahahahahahapic.twitter.com/OAdqdFjy3i

@olgarodriguezfr @maykanavarro @almuariza @QuicoSalles @patricialopezl @SermosGaliza @ecasajoana @EiderHurtado @gnagore @Xlapitz @albertopradilla @garanet @GureEskuDago @neustomas @pilarcarracelas @iuforn @GydeJ @brutofficiel @josebove @Ferrancm @jordiborras @kpagekirby

Wait. You don't want people to be responsible for what they do and think about what they do?

You're very kind to warn me about that.What happens is that the wrong decision you are talking about was taken in 1998 DMCA, and now, we are paying the consequences of that bad.We,authors,are suffering from it since then. We hope that this changes,taking now the correct decission

That I want people to think about what they do and be aware of what their actions mean because they are responsible for their actions and have to face the consequences of their wrongdoing.

Then, since you are so knowledgeable about the law, you will know that at this moment, 100% of the protected content is illegal for users to upload, what is your problem with the license that exempts the user from liability and leaves that responsibility assumed by the platform?